Blogs that discuss topics around travel and tourist attractions as well as a variety of travel tips and tricks

Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts

Wednesday

Post Office sees record £1bn in cash withdrawn in a single month for first time ever

Withdrawals exceeded £1 billion at post offices in December, making it the first recorded instance of such a high level of withdrawals in a single month.

Decoded £979 million worth of personal cash withdrawals in December and £35 million worth of business cash withdrawals.

A previous record high was set in December 2023, when a total of £962.8m was withdrawn from personal and business accounts. In total, cash deposits and withdrawals made over the counter at post offices in December 2024 came to £3.7bn.

From customers who do not use Nationwide, partly because of bank branch closures.

Over £3.7 million in cash was withdrawn or deposited at over 1,300 branches that were open on Christmas Day.

On top of other options, it supports the banking system with alternative essential services following bank branch closures.

Ross Borkett, Post Office banking director, said: "Our statistics show that millions of people obviously still count on cash to handle their finances on a daily basis."

We observed considerable sums of cash being taken out every day in the lead-up to Christmas Day, underlining the importance of individuals being able to remove the exact amount of cash they require, down to the last penny, from our branches.

It's a credit to the hard work of postmasters and their staff that over a billion pounds was withdrawn over the counter in a single month. They keep their branches open for long hours, with many open at weekends.

We are aware that when people withdraw cash from local banks, they usually spend it in the same area, thereby highlighting the importance of postmasters in maintaining the vitality of local high streets and generating additional custom for neighbouring businesses.

.

Share:

Hancock to give evidence as Covid inquiry explores vaccine issues

Public hearings for the fourth part of the Covid-19 Inquiry are due to start on Tuesday, with former Health Secretary Matt Hancock set to give evidence this week.

The hearings, taking place from 14 January to 31 January, will examine the matters connected to the creation and deployment of vaccines in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.

Britain was the first country to roll out an approved Covid-19 vaccine throughout the world.

A historic nationwide vaccination programme aimed at combating the virus got underway on 8 December 2020, with doses manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech, AstraZeneca and Moderna being made available.

At its peak, there were well over 4,000 accredited vaccination sites operational across NHS's seven regions and 153 local authorities.

Information from the NHS states that by 5 January 2025, over 175 million vaccinations had been given in England.

Module four of the COVID-19 inquiry will look into the development, purchasing, production, and approval of the vaccines and the measures taken to permit the use of novel treatments throughout the crisis.

It will examine obstacles to vaccine uptake, including faith in the jabs and difficulties gaining access, as well as concerns about vaccine safety and a suggested link between Covid-19 vaccines and heart problems.

The probe will also examine if changes are required to the UK Vaccine damage payment scheme – which grants a one-off tax-free payment of £120,000 to those left disabled due to vaccinations.

This week's evidence sessions will commence with opening statements from key parties involved, followed by testimony from representatives of grief-stricken families as well as organisations representing individuals affected by vaccine complications.

Matt Hancock, who served as health secretary from 2018 until June 2021, will be giving evidence on Thursday.

He will be succeeded by Professor Heidi Larson, a leading authority on vaccine hesitation.

On Friday, the sessions will feature appearances by Lord Alok Sharma, the former business secretary; Dr Clara Swinson, the former top official for global health and health protection at the Department of Health and Social Care; and Catherine Little, the former second-in-command at HM Treasury.

Share:

Tuesday

Labour-run council hits buyers of empty homes with five-figure tax bills

Accumulated by former proprietors.

Inheriting substantial council tax arrears.

In June 2023, Maxine Fothergill acquired two uninhabitable flats, which she intended to restore and later let out as rental properties.

– informed Ms Fothergill that due to the two flats being vacant for over two years prior to her purchase, she would be subject to a 200% empty homes council tax surcharge.

She was informed that the previous owner was liable for the liability. As a result, the combined council tax bill for the two properties soared to £10,500.

I couldn't find any text to paraphrase. Please provide the text you'd like me to paraphrase.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government informed The Telegraph that the premium comes into effect from the date a property was first registered as empty, and does not restart when a property is sold on.

For local authorities to impose either of these council tax premiums on second homes or vacant properties, or indeed both, the properties must be deemed habitable.

Ms Fothergill's two flats had been stood vacant for nearly 25 years. Over that period, ceilings had given way, floor joists had decayed, windows and plumbing had gone missing, and vegetation had begun to sprout over the walls and kitchen worktops.

Two flats on the ground floor have been sold at auction for cash, and Ms Fothergill's investments will soon be featured in an upcoming series of Homes Under the Hammer, highlighting the 18-month transformation she has masterminded.

‘Councils view landlords as targets’

In spite of presenting proof that the property was in an uninhabitable condition, the local authority continued to push the charges right through to a magistrates' court.

Medway believed it was possible for individuals to live in the properties, which a surveyor had deemed to be "non-compliant" with the law, with the suggestion that it would require a substantial expenditure of nearly £200,000 to rectify the defects.

Ms Fothergill had to attend the magistrates' court and engage the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) to remove the properties from the council tax valuation list, taking with her a 600-page document.

The VOA gave her a ruling in her favour on 23 December, just before Christmas, preventing the council from continuing with the tax charges.

She said: "I think councils see us, landlords, as targets. They consider us easy prey, with easy access to funds. They think we can afford it. Well, not when we're already investing so much in restoring properties to make them affordable for local renters. I don't have endless funds available - this is how we make a living."

“I’d been open and honest, going straight to the local councillors to introduce myself. I thought they’d be pleased we were bringing the property back into a reasonable state of repair. The building had been mortgage-unworthy for nearly 30 years.”

‘It's a bit of a lawless place out there’

Azith Gungah was faced with identical charges after buying two flats in the Medway area. One of them was in a state of disrepair, while the other had been left vacant for two years by the previous owner.

When Mr Gungah appealed the 200 per cent premium, he was summonsed to court. A day prior to his scheduled court appearance, the council dropped the charges.

He said: “It’s like buying a second hand car and paying the earlier owner’s parking fines.”

Another case Mr Gungah is still arguing with the council, nearly nine months on, regarding an ex-drug den he purchased and which had remained unused by previous owners for many years.

The previous owner had subdivided the property into 10 flats. However, the council has since determined that six of those flats were unbuilt, with only four officially sanctioned on paper.

In spite of this, Medway is yet trying to make the new owner pay council tax premiums of 100 pc across all ten flats belonging to that property - a bill that far exceeds eighteen thousand pounds.

Subject to the approval of the local council, these premises have been redeveloped into six self-contained flats, each occupied by families who pay the standard local authority tax on a property.

While the property developer waits for a decision from the VOA, which he first approached six months ago, he has been told by the council to pay £500 a month for each of the 10 "flats" until the matter is resolved.

He said: “The council class more than half of them as unlawful. We shouldn't be held accountable for paying bills for all 10. This whole situation is consuming a huge amount of time and resources from my team. It's a completely unregulated environment.”

When you attend a magistrates' court, you're essentially entering a facility rather than a formal courtroom. You won't see a judge, but instead, a court clerk will be present. Upon arrival, you'll enter a waiting area and proceed to a desk where a local authority employee, typically employed by the council, sits at a counter with a list of individuals who have fallen behind with their council tax payments.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government stated that, although the period of time during which a property is deemed empty doesn't reset when ownership changes hands, local councils should take a balanced approach to enforcing this policy.

A spokesperson for Medway Council stated: “We're unable to comment on the personal accounts of individual residents, but we are compelled to issue council tax bills for all properties that the VOA has designated a council tax band for.”

Play The Telegraph's excellent selection of Puzzles - and feel more cheerful every day. Challenge your mind and improve your mood with PlusWord, the Mini Crossword, the challenging Killer Sudoku and even the traditional Cryptic Crossword.

Share: